Brazilian society of rheumatology methodological guide for the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines in rheumatology.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are developed to align standards of health care around the world, aiming to reduce the incidence of misconducts and enabling more effective use of health resources. Considering the complexity, cost, and time involved in formulating CPG, strategies should be used to facilitate and guide authors through each step of this process. The main objective of this document is to present a methodological guide prepared by the Epidemiology Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the elaboration of CPG in rheumatology. Through an extensive review of the literature, this study compiles the main practical recommendations regarding the following steps of CPG drafting: distribution of working groups, development of the research question, search, identification and selection of relevant studies, evidence synthesis and quality assessment of the body of evidence, the Delphi methodology for consensus achievement, presentation and dissemination of the recommendations, CPG quality assessment and updating. This methodological guide serves as an important tool for rheumatologists to develop reliable and high-quality CPG, standardizing clinical practices worldwide.

Brazilian society of rheumatology methodological guide for the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines in rheumatology

Abstract Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are developed to align standards of health care around the world, aiming to reduce the incidence of misconducts and enabling more effective use of health resources. Considering the complexity, cost, and time involved in formulating CPG, strategies should be used to facilitate and guide authors through each step of this process. The main objective of this document is to present a methodological guide prepared by the Epidemiology Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the elaboration of CPG in rheumatology. Through an extensive review of the literature, this study compiles the main practical recommendations regarding the following steps of CPG drafting: distribution of working groups, development of the research question, search, identification and selection of relevant studies, evidence synthesis and quality assessment of the body of evidence, the Delphi methodology for consensus achievement, presentation and dissemination ofthe recommendations, CPG quality assessment and updating. This methodological guide serves as an important tool for rheumatologists to develop reliable and high-quality CPG, standardizing clinical practices worldwide.

Padrões de imunofluorescência do fator antinuclear (FAN) em células HEp-2 de soros reagentes para anti-SSA/Ro / Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) immunofluorescent patterns in HEp-2 cells on samples positive for anti-SSA/Ro

OBJETIVO: avaliar os padrões de imunofluorescência do fator antinuclear (FAN) em soros reagentes para anticorpos anti-SSA/Ro e sua associação clínica. MÉTODO: foi realizado um estudo transversal retrospectivo, no qual foram revisadas as solicitações de anticorpos antiantígenos nucleares extraíveis (anti-ENA) encaminhadas ao SPC/HCPA no período de dois anos. Das solicitações com resultado positivo para anti-ENA identificou-se qual ou quais auto-anticorpos estavam envolvidos (anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSB/La, anti-RNP, anti-Sm, anti-Scl-70), bem como os padrões de imunofluorescência do FAN e os quadros clínicos dos pacientes anti-SSA/Ro positivo. As técnicas usadas para detecção e identificação foram FAN por imunofluorescência indireta (IFI) em células HEp-2 e anti-ENA por hemaglutinação. RESULTADOS: das 392 solicitações analisadas 90 eram anti-ENA positivo. Houve um predomínio do sexo feminino (94 por cento) (86/91) e a idade média foi de 42 anos. O anti-SSA/Ro foi o mais freqüente (67,8 por cento) (61/90), sendo que todas as amostras anti-SSA/Ro positivas eram positivas para o FAN. O padrão de imunofluorescência nuclear pontilhado fino foi o predominante (68,9 por cento) (42/61) nos pacientes com anti-SSA/Ro positivo, e o quadro clínico mais encontrado foi de lúpus eritematoso sistêmico, em 50,8 por cento (31/61) dos pacientes. CONCLUSÃO: o teste de FAN por IFI utilizando células HEp-2 é um bom método de triagem para detecção de auto-anticorpos anti-SSA/Ro, apresentando maior associação com o padrão nuclear pontilhado fino. Diferente do que tem sido descrito na literatura, não encontramos nenhuma amostra de pacientes com anti-SSA/Ro que tenham apresentado FAN falso-negativo na IFI. Pelo menos na nossa experiência, esses dados questionam o custo-efetividade da solicitação de rotina desse exame em pacientes FAN negativo pelo teste de IFI.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the pattern at immunofluorescence of the antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detected by the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) technique in positive samples for anti-SSA/Ro autoantibody and the clinical associations. METHODS: a retrospective transversal study was performed in a period of two years where the all the solicitations of testing for the presence of anti-extractable nuclear antigen (anti-ENA) antibodies delivered to the SPC/HCPA were analyzed. We selected the positive samples and identified which autoantibodies were involved (anti-SSA/RO, anti-SSB/La, anti-RNP, anti-Sm and anti-Scl70) as well as the immunofluorescence patterns by ANA testing and the clinical associations found in the patients presenting anti-SSA/Ro positive serum. IIF was used for ANA using HEp-2 cells and hemagglutination for anti-ENA antibodies detection. RESULTS: 90 out of the 392 solicitations analyzed were anti-ENA positive, with a predominance of women (86/91 - 94 percent) and the mean age was 42 years old. The most frequent autoantibody was anti-SSA/Ro (61/90 - 67.8 percent) and all samples that were anti-SSA/Ro positive were also ANA positive. Speckled nuclear immunofluorescence was the most frequent ANA pattern (42/61 - 68.9 percent) among the anti-SSA/Ro positive samples and systemic lupus erythematosus was the most common clinical diagnosis (31/61 - 50.8 percent). CONCLUSION: ANA testing by IIF using HEp-2 cells proved to be a good screening test for the detection of anti-SSA/Ro antibodies, that showed a strong positive association to the speckled nuclear IIF pattern. As opposed to what has been described in the literature, there was no ANA negative among the anti-SSA/Ro positive samples. At least in our experience, these data question the cost-effectiveness of performing routine screening for anti-SSA/Ro antibodies in ANA negative samples by IIF testing.